2

Forward-Looking Statements

This report includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All statements other than statements of historical fact are “forward-looking statements” for purposes of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including any projections of earnings, revenue or other financial items, any statements regarding the plans and objectives of management for future operations, any statements concerning proposed new products or services, any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance, any statements regarding expected benefits from any transactions and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “potential” or “continue,” or the negative thereof or other comparable terminology. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations or any of the forward-looking statements will prove to be correct and actual results could differ materially from those projected or assumed in the forward-looking statements. Thus, investors should refer to and carefully review information in future documents Nuvilex, Inc. files with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our future financial condition and results of operations, as well as any forward-looking statements, are subject to inherent risk and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risk factors set forth in “Part II, Item 1A – Risk Factors” below and for the reasons described elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. All forward looking statements and reasons why results may differ included in this report are made as of the date hereof and we do not intend to update any forward-looking statements accept as required by law or applicable regulations. Except where the context otherwise requires, in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the “Company,” “Nuvilex,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Nuvilex, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and, where appropriate, its subsidiaries.

3

PART 1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM  1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The unaudited financial statements included herein have been prepared by Nuvilex, Inc. (the “Company”). In the opinion of management, the interim financial statements reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature necessary for a fair statement of the results for interim periods. It is suggested these financial statements and notes to the financial statements be read in conjunction with financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Form 10-K Report for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011.

4

NUVILEX, INC.

C O N T E N T S

Consolidated Balance Sheets July 31, 2011 (Unaudited) and April 30, 2011

6

Consolidated Unaudited Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended

July 31, 2011 and 2010

7

Consolidated Unaudited Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

as of July 31, 2011

8

Consolidated Unaudited Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended

July 31, 2011 and 2010

9

Notes to Consolidated Unaudited Financial Statements

10

5

6

7

8

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

9

NUVILEX, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JULY 31, 2011

 (UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1 – BACKGROUND, ACQUISITION AND LIQUIDITY

Nuvilex, Inc. operates independently and through wholly-owned subsidiaries.  We are dedicated to bringing to market scientifically derived products designed to improve the health and well-being of those who use them. The Company’s current strategy is to focus on developing and marketing products in the biotechnology arena it believes have potential for long-term corporate growth.

This summary of accounting policies for Nuvilex, Inc. and its subsidiaries is presented to assist in understanding the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The accounting policies conform to generally accepted accounting principles and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.

Background

The Company was founded as DJH International, Inc., a Nevada corporation, on October 28, 1996, and changed its name to eFoodSafety.com, Inc. following the October 16, 2000 acquisition of Global Procurement Systems, Inc. The Company acquired Ozone Safe Food, Inc. for Common Stock on October 29, 2003. The Company’s early mission was to provide methods and products to ensure the safety of marketed fruits and vegetables worldwide. On February 4, 2004, the Company registered shares with the Securities and Exchange Commission and its Common Stock began publicly trading on the OTC Bulletin Board under the trading symbol EFSF. The Company did not issue shares of Common Stock pursuant to an initial public offering. With less than projected demand for its produce sterilization methods and software tracking products, the Company changed its strategy and acquired Knock-Out Technologies, Ltd. and MedElite, Inc. in May 2004 and August 2005, respectively, of which Knock-Out Technologies, Ltd. was a developer of products using organic, non-toxic, food based substances and MedElite, Inc. was the exclusive U.S. distributor of Talsyn^TM-CI Scar Cream (“Talsyn”), a topical scar- reducing cream. The Company’s new strategy was to bring to market scientifically derived products designed to improve the health and well-being of those who use them. The Company sold its Ozone Safe Food, Inc. operations in August 2005. In November 2006, the Company formed Cinnergen, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary, to manufacture and market a non-prescription liquid nutritional supplement designed to promote healthy glucose metabolism, and purEffect, Inc., another wholly-owned subsidiary, to manufacture and market purEffect^TM, a four-step non-prescription acne treatment. On March 10, 2006, the Company licensed the marketing rights for purEffect^TM to Charlston Kentrist 41 Direct, Inc. (“CK41”). In July 2007, the Company formed I-Boost, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary, to manufacture and market a food bar designed to improve the effectiveness of the human immune system. In March 2008, the Company formed Cinnechol, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary, to manufacture and market a non-prescription nutritional supplement designed to promote cardiovascular health. In February 2009, the Company sold the rights to the purEffect^TM product to CK41 for an equity position in CK41 and future royalty compensation. In March 2009, the Company acquired Freedom2 Holdings, Inc., the manufacturer and marketer of Infinitink®, a permanent tattoo ink designed to be removed more easily using conventional laser removal methods. On March 18, 2009, the Company changed its name to Nuvilex, Inc.

Acquisition Purchase Price

On May 26, 2011, The Company entered into a purchase agreement with SG Austria, Inc. whereby the Company is to pay $200,000 to acquire the pancreatic cancer treatment owned by SG Austria.  This purchase has been completed from Company funds provided by interested shareholders and are classified as assets since this acquisition will provide a substantial positive growth value for Nuvilex.

Subsequently, it was decided to acquire SG Austria through a merger and share exchange agreement consisting of the parent company SG Austria, Austrianova Singapore Pte, Ltd., and BioBlueBird AG. To complete the entire acquisition, items were to be provided to SG Austria by Nuvilex, in addition to Nuvilex remaining a publicly traded company: 1) funding for outstanding loans for BioBlueBird of $500,000 or Nuvilex shares or a combination of the two; 2) a share exchange to be determined based on Nuvilex share price and reaching milestones; and 3) temporary monthly funding during the transition of which $240,000 has been completed from Company funds provided by interested shareholders.  These requirements were agreed to in order to provide initial funding for SG Austria and enable it to: 1) carry out company activities; and 2) initiate IND preparation, regulatory and GMP activities in anticipation of clinical trials.  

In the event of Cancellation or Termination of this Agreement without consummation, Nuvilex shall receive a pro-rata ownership percentage in SG Austria based on 0.8496% of SG Austria’s shares for every $60,000 USD payment and 2.83% of SG Austria for the payment of the $200,000. As of September 19, 2011 the Company has paid $440,000 of the total purchase price, which still requires additional funding and stock for completion of the purchase and closing will occur when all of the issues regarding the agreement are fulfilled.  According to the original agreement, in order to close this acquisition, Nuvilex must raise approximately $3 Million USD minus the amount of money that has been provided to them for maintaining operations during the present period prior to October 31, 2011, which can be extended through the agreement of both parties.

10

NOTE 2 - Going Concern and Management’s Plans

The Company's financial statements are prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) applicable to a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has not yet established an ongoing source of revenue sufficient to cover its operating costs and allow it to continue as a going concern. In addition, as of July 31, 2011, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $38,634,713, had incurred a net loss for the quarter ended July 31, 2011 of $686,020 and had negative working capital of $2,953,016. Funding has been provided by various investors which have primarily enabled continuance of Nuvilex to date. The Company’s current business plan requires additional funding beyond its anticipated cash flows from operations. These and other factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

Strategy

As mentioned in the 2011 10-K, the Company’s overall goal of long-term growth has been working to stabilize its financial condition. The Company’s financial stability efforts include four primary components:        

1.

Maintenance of the Company’s cash burn rate,

2.

Sale or lease of the Freedom-2 Holdings, Inc. property and completion of the Company’s plan to resolve all debts,

3.

Ongoing execution of the Company’s revenue growth strategy, and

4.

Expansion of effort on biotechnology to the overall goals and mission of Nuvilex.

NOTE 3 – Significant Accounting Policies

Unaudited Financial Statements

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”), for interim financial information and pursuant to the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months ended July 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending April 30, 2012. The balance sheet at July 31, 2011, has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2011.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Nuvilex, Inc. and its subsidiaries, Knock-Out Technologies, Ltd., MedElite, Inc., Cinnergen, Inc., I-Boost, Inc., Cinnechol Inc., Freedom-2 Holdings, Inc, Freedom-2, Inc. and Exceptional Equipment and Ink Supply Company, Inc. With respect to the latter three subsidiaries the financials include the profit and loss activity from the date of purchase March 2, 2009 to January 31, 2011 as the acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting.

All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents to the extent the funds are not being held for investment purposes. There were no cash equivalents as of July 31, 2011 or April 30, 2011.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is computed on a weighted-average basis, which approximates the first-in, first-out method; market is based upon estimated replacement costs.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP required management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

11

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Expenditures that increase the useful lives or capacities of the plant and equipment are capitalized. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to income as incurred. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives as follows:

Computer equipment/software

3 years

Furniture and fixtures

7 years

Machinery and equipment

7 years

Building improvements

15 years

Building

40 years

Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangibles

The Company records the excess of purchase price over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired as goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangibles. The FASB standard on goodwill and other intangible assets, prescribes a two-step process for impairment testing of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles, which is performed annually, as well as when an event triggering impairment may have occurred. The first step tests for impairment, while the second step, if necessary, measures the impairment. The Company has elected to perform its annual analysis at the end of its reporting year.

Valuation of long-lived assets

The Company accounts for the valuation of long-lived assets under the FASB standard for accounting for the impairment or disposal of Long-Lived Assets. The FASB standard requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangible assets be reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of the long-lived assets is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to future undiscounted net cash flows generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the estimated fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value, less cost to sell.  

Basic and Diluted Earnings (Loss) per Share

Basic and diluted earnings per share is calculated using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period without consideration of the dilutive effect of stock warrants, convertible notes and convertible preferred shares.

Fair value of financial instruments

For certain of the Company’s non-derivative financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable, and other accrued liabilities, the carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. The estimated fair value of long-term debt is based primarily on borrowing rates currently available to the Company for similar debt issues. The fair value approximates the carrying value of long-term debt.

ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments held by the Company. ASC Topic 825, “Financial Instruments,” defines fair value, and establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement that enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures.  The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for receivables and current liabilities each qualify as financial instruments and are a reasonable estimate of their fair values because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization and their current market rate of interest. The three levels of valuation hierarchy are defined as follows:

12

The following presents the gross value of assets and liabilities that were measured and recognized at fair value.

Effective October 1, 2008, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ("ASC 820-10") and Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 825-10, Financial Instruments ("ASC 825-10"), which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. Neither of these statements had an impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued expenses, as reflected in the balance sheets, approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.

As of July 31, 2011 and April 30, 2011 the Company has recorded several of its assets and liabilities at fair value. The building held for sale was written down in the last quarter of fiscal 2010 to its fair value based upon a pending sale agreement. Although the agreement was not finalized it established the current market value for the property (refer to Note 7).  In March of 2009 through the acquisition of another company the Company acquired certain debt. As part of the acquisition these liabilities were evaluated by a third party and valued at fair value at which they were recorded. As a result of this the Company is amortizing the associated discount and premium for two of the liabilities (refer to Note 8).

Recent accounting pronouncements

In May 2011, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.    This ASU clarifies the board's intent of current guidance, modifies and changes certain guidance and principles, and adds additional disclosure requirements concerning the 3 levels of fair value measurements. Specific amendments are applied to FASB ASC 820-10-35, Subsequent Measurement and FASB ASC 820-10-50, Disclosures. This ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011.

In June 2011, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. - ASU 2011-05. Current US GAAP allows companies to present the components of comprehensive income as a part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity. This ASU eliminates that option. in this Update, an entity has the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income This ASU is effective interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011.

This ASU should be applied retrospectively. There are no specific transition disclosures

In December 2010, the FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-29 Business Combinations Topic 805, which requires a public entity to disclose pro forma information for business combinations that occurred in the current reporting period. The disclosures include pro forma revenue and earnings of the combined entity for the current reporting period as though the acquisition date for all business combinations that occurred during the year had been as of the beginning of the annual reporting period. If comparative financial statements are presented, the pro forma revenue and earnings of the combined entity for the comparable prior reporting period should be reported as though the acquisition date for all business combinations that occurred during the current year had been as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period. Effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010.

The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect.  These pronouncements did not have any material impact on the financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and the Company does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

Revenue Recognition

Sales of products and related costs of products sold are recognized when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) delivery has occurred, (iii) the price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. These terms are typically met upon the prepayment or invoicing and shipment of products.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company provides an allowance for estimated uncollectible accounts receivable balances based on historical experience and the aging of the related accounts receivable.

13

Income Taxes

Deferred taxes are calculated using the liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases.  Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

In June 2006, the FASB interpreted its standard for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, an interpretation of accounting for income taxes.  This interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity’s financial statements in accordance the minimum recognition threshold and measurement attributable to a tax position taken on a tax return is required to be met before being recognized in the financial statements.

The FASB’s interpretation had no material impact on the Company’s financial statements for the quarter ended July 31, 2011 or the year ended April 30, 2011. As of July 31, 2011, the Company had a net operating loss carry forward for income tax reporting purposes of approximately $35,514,000 that may be offset against future taxable income through 2027. Current tax laws limit the amount of loss available to be offset against future taxable income when a substantial change in ownership occurs. Therefore, the amount available to offset future taxable income may be limited. No tax benefit has been reported in the financial statements, because the Company believes there is a 50% or greater chance the carry forwards will expire unused. Accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the loss carry forwards are offset by a valuation allowance of the same amount.

Research and Development Costs

Expenditures for research and development are expensed as incurred. Such costs are required to be expensed until the point that technological feasibility is established.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company has no significant off-balance-sheet concentrations of credit risk such as foreign exchange contracts, options contracts or other foreign hedging arrangements. The Company maintains the majority of its cash balances with one financial institution in the form of demand deposits.

Reclassifications

Certain items in the prior year financial statements have been reclassified for comparative purposes to conform to the presentation in the current period’s presentation. These reclassifications have no effect on the previously reported income (loss).

NOTE 4 – ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

The Company recognizes receivables predominately on sales of its Cinnergen product.  At July 31, 2011 and April 30, 2011 the company recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,906.

NOTE 5 - INVENTORY

On July 31, 2011 and April 30, 2010, inventory consisted of $7,617 and $18,706, respectively of finished goods inventory for Cinnergen™ products. Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is computed on a weighted-average basis, which approximates the first-in, first-out method; market is based upon estimated replacement costs.

14

NOTE 6 - FIXED ASSETS

Fixed assets consisted of the following:

Depreciation expense for the three months ended July 31, 2011 and April 30, 2011 was $32,220 and $88,800, respectively.

NOTE 7 - ASSETS HELD FOR SALE

NOTE 8 – DEBT

As of July 31, 2011 and April 30, 2011, respectively, the following debts associated with the Freedom-2 Holdings, Inc. subsidiary are as follows:

15

On July 30, 2009, the mortgage agreement with Cornerstone Bank was modified whereby the principle of $43,572 paid to date on the note was re-advanced to the borrower returning the principle balance to $1,600,000. Payments under the modified agreement commenced on September 1, 2009.

There have been pending sales of the Company’s building in 2008 and again in 2009 and 2010, which would have accelerated the payment of the Cornerstone Bank mortgage.  In addition, there was a temporary leasing of a small separated portion of the building in 2009, which unfortunately ended due to bankruptcy of the lessee, Eldon of NJ.  Although the Company’s efforts continue in this area to sell or lease part or all of the building, to date, the large number of vacant properties in the Cherry Hill, NJ region have made it difficult to accomplish either, through and including the current year. Accordingly, although the maturity date of the mortgage extends to February 1, 2013, the Company recognizes the entire outstanding mortgage value as a current liability. At the date of acquisition the mortgage and license fee payable were recorded at fair value on the Company’s balance sheet. The above schedule adjusts the book value of those liabilities to their fair value, net of applicable amortization of the discount and premium as of July 31, 2011 and April 30, 2011.

NOTE 9 - COMMON STOCK TRANSACTIONS

On May 4, 2011, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation with the state of Nevada to increase the authorized Common Stock from Five Hundred Million (500,000,000) to One Billion Four Hundred Ninety Million (1,490,000,000).

During the three months ended July 31, 2011, 9,750,000 shares of common stock were issued to various investors for $621,000 cash received. $148,000 of this amount has been recorded as a stock receivable and is expected to be received in the second quarter.

16

In May 2011, 250,000 shares of common stock were issued for compensation recorded as a stock payable as of April 30, 2011. Shares were valued using the closing stock price on the day of issuance for a total expense of $7,500 in the prior year ended 2011.

During the three months ended July 31, 2011, 2,250,000 shares of common stock were issued to Dr. Robert F. Ryan, Ms. Patricia Gruden and Dr. Gerald W. Crabtree, officers of the Company, and Robert Bowker for compensation. Shares were valued using the closing stock price on the day of granting for a total expense of $135,375.

During the three months ended July 31, 2011, the company authorized the issuance of 3,025,000 shares of common stock for compensation to its officers for total expense of $175,939. As of July 31, 2011 these shares had not yet been issued by the transfer agent and were recorded as stock payable. Shares were valued using the closing stock price on the date of grant.

In June, 2011 the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of restricted stock to an officer as an incentive for the exchange of free trading shares of common stock. The shares were issued at $0.057 using the closing stock price on the date of grant for a valuation of $ 57,000.

In June, 2011 the Company issued 650,000 shares of common stock to two shareholders as an incentive for the exchange of free trading shares of common stock for restricted shares of common stock. The shares were issued at $0.07 using the closing stock price on the date of grant for a valuation of $44,750.

In May, 2011 the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock as part of compensation for marketing services to Evergreen Marketing. Shares were issued at $0.056 using the closing stock price on the date of grant for a valuation of $111,800.

During the three months ended July 31, 2011, the company issued 300,000 shares of common stock for consulting services issued at $0.057 using the closing stock price on the date of grant for a total valuation of $17,100.

On January 31, 2011 5,000,000 shares of common stock were issued to Dr. Robert F. Ryan for $100,000 cash received.

During the year ended April 30, 2011, 3,750,000 shares of common stock were issued to Dr. Robert F. Ryan, Ms. Patricia Gruden and Dr. Gerald W. Crabtree, officers of the Company for compensation. Shares were valued using the closing stock price on the day of issuance for a total expense of $92,250.

During the year ended April 30, 2011, the company authorized the issuance of 1,375,000 shares of common stock for compensation to its officers for total expense of $37,750.  As of April 30, 2011 these shares had not yet been issued by the transfer agent.

In connection with litigation with Cornerstone bank (note 12) there is a claim to enforce a purported pledge of additional collateral of 14,605,614 shares of common stock as security for a Note held by them. It should be noted that the shares pledged by Freedom-2 and purportedly owed by the Company to Cornerstone Bank were not part of the mortgage note, but the shares in question were above, beyond, and thus in addition to the note as collateral for obtaining the second mortgage modification, they have been indicated as additional collateral, since they were not part nor parcel of the original note nor its modification itself except as collateral.  The Company has recorded a stock payable and expense in the amount of $730,281 to account for the shares.

All shares were issued without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in reliance upon the exemption afforded by Section 4(2) of that Act. No underwriters were involved.

NOTE 10 - PREFERRED STOCK

Series E Preferred Stock has, among others, the following features:

· Series E Preferred Shares will not bear any dividends.

· Each share of Series E Preferred Stock is entitled to receive its share of assets distributable upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Company. The holders of the Series E Preferred Shares shall be entitled to receive in cash out of the assets of the Company before any amount shall be paid to the holders of any capital stock of the Company of any class junior in rank to the Series E Preferred Shares.

· Each share of Series E Preferred Stock is convertible, at the holder’s option, into shares of Common Stock, at the average Closing Bid Price of the Company ’ s common stock for five (5) trading days prior to the Conversion Date.

· At every meeting of stockholders, every holder of Series E Preferred Stock is entitled to 50,000 votes for each share of Series E Preferred Stock in his name, with the same and identical voting rights as a holder of a share of Common Stock; therefore, the holder of the preferred stock can effectively increase the Company issued Common Stock shares without a vote of the Common Stock shareholders thus enabling any potential shortfall of authorized common shares outstanding from being covered should the Preferred Stockholders wish to convert.

17

On March 1, 2011, the Company issued 3,500 shares of preferred stock to a shareholder for an $80,000 loan that was made to the company. Based on prior year issuance of preferred stock, the original valuation was $50.00/share and since the valuation of the preferred stock for this loan was set to $80,000 per 3,500 shares or $22.86/share, the Company has recorded a loss on conversion of debt of $95,000 for year ending April 30, 2011.

The average Closing Bid Price at April 30, 2011 was $0.03. Based on the Series E Preferred Stock provisions, if converted on April 30, 2011, the outstanding 3,500 Series E Preferred Shares would have converted into 2,666,667 shares of the Company’s common stock.

Under the terms of the Series E Stock Certificate, the holders have specific rights to be paid in cash out of the assets of the Company prior to any junior class shares.  As a result of the obligations for Series E preferred shares, the Company has determined these redemption features have the potential to be outside the control of the Company, and accordingly, the Company has classified the Series E shares outside of shareholder’s equity in accordance with ASC 480 regarding instruments with debt and equity features.  Thus, the full value for the convertible Preferred Stock was recorded outside of stockholders’ equity in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.  

NOTE 11 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In July 2011, a claim was filed by Cornerstone Bank against Freedom-2, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, for amounts due under a promissory note. The bank is also seeking to foreclose its mortgage on the property located in Cherry Hill, New Jersey for which the promissory note is held. Although at this time it is unknown what any estimated loss may be, it is reasonable to assume at least a loss between $750,000 and $1,000,000 is possible, with a worst case scenario of a 100% liability plus any applicable fees. In addition, there is a claim to enforce a purported pledge of additional collateral of 14,605,614 shares of common stock as security for the Note.  It should be noted that the shares pledged by Freedom-2 and purportedly owed by the Company to Cornerstone Bank were not part of the mortgage note, but the shares in question were above, beyond, and thus in addition to the note as collateral for obtaining the second mortgage modification, they have been indicated as additional collateral, since they were not part nor parcel of the original note nor its modification itself except as collateral.  The Company has recorded a stock payable and expense in the amount of $730,281 to account for the shares at April 30, 2011.

NOTE 12 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On February 11, 2009, the Company and Charlston Kentrist 41 Direct, Inc. (CK-41) restructured its Marketing Agreement (the “ restructured agreement ” ) surrounding purEffect ™ , an acne treatment system. Under the terms of the restructured agreement, the Company will transfer all of its rights to purEffect ™  to CK-41 for four million two hundred-fifty thousand (4,250,000) shares of CK-41 common stock at the price of $0.01 per share. CK-41 will also grant the Company a three-year warrant to purchase an additional four million two hundred-fifty thousand (4,250,000) shares of common stock at $6.00 per share. Additionally, the Company will receive a two percent (2%) royalty on worldwide purEffect ™  adjusted net sales. The restructured agreement set minimum royalty payments of one hundred-fifty thousand ($150,000) dollars payable March 1, 2010 and two hundred-fifty thousand ($250,000) dollars payable on March 1, 2011.  In addition to these royalty payments, a one hundred thousand ($100,000) dollar late penalty is due if not paid by the appropriate due date.  The Company was also guaranteed to hold one seat on the Board of Directors of CK-41.  In the event royalty payments are not paid in full, the agreement has a full product recall right, that Nuvilex can, at its option, recall the product, advertising, and all other aspects of purEffect ™  treatment spent or accumulated to date, back to Nuvilex.  This would then allow Nuvilex the opportunity to develop purEffect ™  from that point forward.  As of April 30, 2011, CK-41 remains delinquent in its payments and the associated penalties. Accordingly, the Company has no assurance this royalty payment will be made for the purEffect ™  product and is considering appropriate activities as a result.

On November 4, 2009, the Company and Legacy Biotechnologies, Inc. (Legacy) entered into a Joint Venture Agreement (the “joint venture” ) to collaborate on the research and development of its cancer therapy technology. Under the terms of the joint venture, Knock-Out Technologies, Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Nuvilex, Inc., granted access to Legacy to certain intellectual property, know-how and research data in support of the Company ’ s cancer therapy development program. Legacy is to provide financial and technical assistance to advance the Company ’ s cancer therapy development program to proof of concept and potentially to an FDA Investigational New Drug (IND), which would allow the treatment(s) to be taken through clinical trials and ultimately to a potential New Drug Application (NDA), all prior to marketing. Under the terms of the joint venture agreement, Legacy will be entitled to 100% of net revenues or royalties received from sales of products containing Nuvilex’s cancer therapy technology up to its aggregate investment in the cancer therapy development program. Thereafter, Legacy and Nuvilex will split the net revenue and/or royalties received, 60 and 40%, respectively.  The Company, in conjunction with its subsidiary Knock-Out Technologies, Ltd. and joint venture partner Legacy Biotechnologies, Inc., initiated, carried out and reported preliminary study findings undertaken with Alternia™ , the Company’s first natural product cancer agent formulation.  Discovery and Imaging Services (MIR), a subsidiary of Charles River Laboratories, Tier 1 specialists in pre-clinical laboratory services, were used for the studies.  Results of animal tests provided initial information on toxicity, potential future dosages and maximum tolerated dose, providing possible insight into future directions for this agent. Future testing will have to include additional cell line and animal studies to determine specific cancer cell types which Alternia™ may be effective against.  Revenue is not anticipated from this product until substantial preclinical testing has been completed followed by clinical testing in humans.

18

The Company has had a consulting agreement with Mr. Robert Bowker, President, Knock-Out Technologies, Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Nuvilex, Inc., for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011 the Company incurred consulting fees of $27,720. During the three months ended July 31, 2011 Mr. Robert Bowker, President, Knock-Out Technologies, Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Nuvilex, Inc., was issued 500,000 shares of common stock. 250,000 shares were valued at $0.07 and 250,000 were valued at $0.06  using the closing stock price on the date of grant for a valuation of $32,500.

In June, 2011 the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of restricted stock to an officer as an incentive for the exchange of free trading shares of common stock. The shares were issued at $0.057 using the closing stock price on the date of grant for a valuation of $57,000.

In June, 2011 the Company issued 150,000 shares of restricted stock to a majority shareholder as an incentive for the exchange of free trading shares of common stock. The shares were issued at $0.07 using the closing stock price on the date of grant for a valuation of $10,500.

As of July 31, 2011 the balance due to an officer for loan advances was $29,700.

NOTE 13 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has performed an evaluation of subsequent events in accordance with ASC Topic 855.  Other than the events noted below, the Company is not aware of any subsequent events which would require recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.

Subsequent to July 31, 2011 the Company authorized the issuance of 2,325,000 shares of common stock to its various officers for compensation.

Subsequent to July 31, 2011 the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock to Mr. Robert Bowker, President, Knock-Out Technologies, Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Nuvilex, Inc.

19

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2011 AND 2010

The following discussion may contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed here. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, any factors discussed in this section as well as factors described in “Part II, Item 1A – Risk Factors.”

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2011 AND 2010

SALES

Revenues from operations for the three months ended July 31, 2011 and 2010 were $19,762 and $26,960, respectively. The decrease in quarterly revenue is primarily attributable to the reinitiation of sales of Cinnergen™ and the standard slow-down observed during summer months.

SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

A summary of the Company’s selling, general and administrative costs is as follows:

During the three months ended July 31, 2011, the Company incurred sales and marketing expenses of $125,130 compared to sales and marketing expenses of $7,000 during the three months ended July 31, 2010. Current period sales and marketing expenses increased as a result of the renewal of sales and initiation of internet marketing efforts and for initiation of press releases.

General and administrative expenses increased to $166,039 from $66,230 for the three months ended July 31, 2011 as compared to the prior year. The increase is primarily attributable to a need to clean up prior years operating expenses, funding for the merger of SG Austria, and the reinvigoration of the Company.

Compensation and Legal and professional expenses increased to $316,964 and $48,554 from $0 and $26,139 for the three months ended July 31, 2011 as compared to the prior year. The increase is primarily attributable to the presence of new staff and payments for prior year expenses and public relations firm expenses.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

As of July 31, 2011, the Company had a working capital deficit of $2,953,016.

By adjusting the Company’s operations and through bridge financing to be provided by existing shareholders, management believes it has sufficient capital resources to meet projected cash flow needs. Any failure by the Company to generate sufficient liquidity from operations or in raising sufficient capital resources on terms acceptable to it would have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

The Company’s independent certified public accountants have stated in their reports, which are included as part of the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal years ended April 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, that the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, which raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements, special purpose entities, financing partnerships or guarantees.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable.

ITEM 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of and Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The management of Nuvilex, Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the company’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and includes those policies and procedures that:  

20

·

Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;

·

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and

·

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Because of the inherent limitations of internal control, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.  

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of July 31, 2011. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework.

Based on its assessment, management concluded that, as of July 31, 2011, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is ineffective based on those criteria as they relate to timely and accurate filing.

Changes in Internal Control

During the three months ended July 31, 2011 there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDING

 In July 2011 a claim was filed by Cornerstone Bank against Freedom-2, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, for amounts due under a promissory note. The bank is also seeking to foreclose its mortgage on the property located in Cherry Hill, New Jersey for which the promissory note is held. Although at this time it is unknown what any estimated loss may be, it is reasonable to assume at least an accrued loss between $750,000 - $1,000,000 is possible, with a worst case scenario of a 100% liability plus any applicable fees. In addition, there is a claim to enforce a purported pledge of additional collateral of 14,605,614 shares of Nuvilex common stock as security for the Note. It should be noted that the shares pledged by Freedom-2 and purportedly owed by the Company to Cornerstone Bank were not part of the mortgage note, but the shares in question were above, beyond, and thus in addition to the note as collateral for obtaining the second mortgage modification so they have been indicated as additional collateral, since they were not part nor parcel of the original note nor its modification itself except as collateral.  The Company has recorded a stock payable and expense in the amount of $730,281 to account for the shares.  Communication has been ongoing with Cornerstone Bank through legal means and there has been no material change to date since last reported in the April 30, 2011 10-K report.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider these factors that may affect future results, together with all of the other information included in this Form 10-K, in evaluating the business and the Company. The risks and uncertainties described below are those that the Company currently believes may materially affect its business and results of operations.  Additional risks and uncertainties that Nuvilex is unaware of or that it currently deems immaterial also may become important factors that affect its business and result of operations.  Nuvilex’ common shares involve a high degree of risk and should be purchased only by investors who can afford a loss of their entire investment.  Prospective investors should carefully consider the following risk factors concerning the Company’s business before making an investment.

In addition, you should carefully consider these risks when you read “forward-looking” statements elsewhere in this Form 10-K.  These are statements that relate to the Company’s expectations for future events and time periods.  Generally, the words “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements.  Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, and future events and circumstances could differ significantly from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements.

21

Doubt Regarding Ability to Continue as a Going Concern 

Nuvilex’s financial statements have been presented on the basis that it is and will remain a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company had minimal revenues and incurred net operating losses for the period October 1999 (inception) to July 31, 2011. As the Company’s independent auditors have concluded, these factors create an uncertainty about Nuvilex’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent, among other factors, on its success in marketing its products, containing costs, establishing a credit facility, and/or raising additional equity capital. The financial statements of Nuvilex do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Early Revenue Stage Company:  Generation of Revenues

Nuvilex is an early revenue stage company and an investor cannot reasonably determine if the Company will ever be profitable. Nuvilex is likely to continue to experience financial difficulties during its early revenue stage and beyond. The Company may be unable to operate profitably, even if it generates additional revenues. Nuvilex may not obtain the necessary working capital to continue developing and marketing its products. Furthermore, Nuvilex’s products may not receive sufficient interest to generate revenues or achieve profitability.

Need for Future Capital: Long-Term Viability of Company

Nuvilex will need additional capital to continue its operations.

There can be no assurance that the Company will generate revenues from present operations or obtain sufficient capital on acceptable terms, if at all.  Failure to obtain such capital or generate such operating revenues would have an adverse impact on the Company’s financial position, operations and ability to continue as a going concern.   Nuvilex’ operating and capital requirements during the next fiscal year and thereafter will vary based on a number of factors, including the level of sales and marketing activities for its services and products.  There can be no assurance that additional private or public financing, including debt or equity financing, will be available as needed or if available, on terms favorable to the Company. Additionally, any future equity financing may be dilutive to stockholders present ownership levels and such additional equity securities may have rights, preferences, or privileges that are senior to those of Nuvilex’ existing common stock.

Furthermore, debt financing, if available, will require payment of interest and may involve restrictive covenants that could impose limitations on the flexibility of the Company to operate.  Nuvilex’s failure to successfully obtain additional funding may jeopardize its ability to continue the business and its operations.

Unpredictability of Future Revenues:  Potential Fluctuations in Operating Results 

The Company is currently unable to accurately forecast its revenues. Typically, current and future expense levels are based largely on marketing and development plans and estimates of future revenues. Sales and operating results will generally depend on the volume and timing of orders and on the Company’s ability to fulfill such orders, both of which are difficult to forecast at this stage. Nuvilex may be unable to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected revenue shortfall. Accordingly, any significant shortfall in revenues in relation to planned expenditures could have an immediate adverse effect on the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. Further, as a strategic response to changes in the competitive environment, Nuvilex may from time to time make certain pricing, service or marketing decisions that could have a materially adverse effect on its business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Nuvilex may experience significant fluctuations in future operating results due to a variety of factors, many of which are outside the Company’s control.  Factors that may affect operating results include:  (i) the ability to obtain and retain customers, attract new customers at a steady rate and maintain customer satisfaction with products, (ii) the announcement or introduction of new services by Nuvilex or its competitors, (iii) price competition, (iv) the level of use and consumer acceptance of its products, (v) the amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures relating to expansion of the business, operations and infrastructure, (vi) governmental regulations, and (vii) general economic conditions.

22

Flaws and Defects in Products

Products offered by Nuvilex may contain undetected flaws or defects when first introduced or as new versions are released. Any inaccuracy or defects may result in adverse product reviews and a loss or delay in market acceptance. There can be no assurance that flaws or defects will not be found in Nuvilex products. Flaws and defects, if found, could have a materially adverse effect upon the business operations and financial condition of the Company. Marketing of any of the Company’s potential products may expose the Company to liability claims resulting from the use of the Company’s products. These claims might be made by consumers, health care providers, sellers of the Company’s products or others. A claim, particularly resulting from a clinical trial, or a product recall could harm the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flow and future prospects.

Stock Price Volatility

The market price of the Company’s stock has fluctuated significantly in the past and may continue to fluctuate in the future.  The Company believes that such fluctuations will continue as a result of many factors, including financing plans, future announcements concerning the Company, the Company’s competitors or principal customers regarding financial results or expectations, industry supply or demand dynamics, new product introductions, governmental regulations, the commencement or results of litigation or changes in earnings estimates by analysts.  In addition, in recent years the stock market has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations often for reasons outside the control of the particular companies. These fluctuations as well as general economic, political and market conditions may have an adverse affect on the market price of the Company’s common stock.

Worldwide Economic Conditions

The Company’s financial performance is significantly affected by worldwide economic conditions and the related impact on levels of consumer spending, which has recently deteriorated significantly in many countries and regions, including the U.S., and may remain depressed for the foreseeable future. Demand for the Company’s products is adversely affected by negative macroeconomic factors affecting consumer spending. The severe tightening of consumer credit, low level of consumer liquidity, and extreme volatility in credit and equity markets have weakened consumer confidence and decreased consumer spending. These and other economic factors have reduced demand for the Company’s products and harmed the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations, and to the extent such economic conditions continue, they could cause further harm to the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

Dependence on Sales through Retailers and Distributors

The Company’s business depends significantly upon sales through retailers and distributors, and if the Company’s retailers and distributors are not successful, the Company could experience reduced sales, substantial product returns or increased price protection, any of which would negatively impact the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.  A significant portion of the Company’s sales are made through retailers, either directly or through distributors.  If the Company’s retailers and distributors are not successful due to weak consumer retail demand caused by the current worldwide economic downturn, decline in consumer confidence, or other factors, the Company could continue to experience reduced sales as well as substantial product returns or price protection claims, which would harm the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.  

Limited Senior Management Personnel:  Management of Potential Growth; New Management Team 

Under Nuvilex’s business plan, significant and material matters of business must be conducted and concluded in a timely fashion.  The execution of the Company’s business plan is expected to place a significant strain on the Company’s management while providing little or no immediate compensation.

There can be no assurance that Nuvilex’s planned personnel, systems, procedures and controls will be adequate to support its future operations, that management will be able to hire, train, retain, motivate and manage personnel or that its management will be able to successfully identify, manage and exploit existing and potential market opportunities.  If Nuvilex is unable to manage growth effectively, the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition, results and operations could be adversely affected.

Competition

The market in which Nuvilex competes is highly competitive, and the Company has no assurance that it will be able to compete effectively, especially against established industry competitors with significantly greater financial resources. The Company expects to face competition from a few competitors with significantly greater financial resources, well-established brand names and large, existing customer bases. Nuvilex expects the level of competition to intensify in the future.

23

Dependence on Management

Nuvilex’s performance will be substantially dependent on the continued services and on the performance of the current senior management and other key personnel of the Company. Nuvilex’s performance will also depend on the Company’s ability to retain and motivate its other officers and key employees. The loss of Nuvilex’s chief executive officer or other key employees could have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. Nuvilex’s future success will depend on its ability to identify, attract, hire, train, retain and motivate other highly skilled technical, managerial, merchandising, and marketing and customer service personnel.  Competition for such personnel is intense and there can be no assurance that Nuvilex will be able to successfully attract, assimilate and retain sufficiently qualified personnel. The failure to retain and attract the necessary technical and managerial personnel could have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. 

Development of Brand Awareness 

For certain market segments that Nuvilex plans to pursue, the development of its brand awareness is essential for it to reduce its marketing expenditures over time and realize greater benefits from marketing expenditures.  If the Company’s brand-marketing efforts are unsuccessful, growth prospects, financial condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected. Nuvilex’s brand awareness efforts have required, and will continue to require, incurrence of significant expenses.

Intellectual Property Protection:  Uncertainty of Protection of Proprietary Rights

Nuvilex currently relies on a combination of patents, trademarks, trade secret protection, non-disclosure agreements and licensing arrangements to establish and protect its proprietary rights. Despite efforts to safeguard and maintain Nuvilex’s proprietary rights, there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in doing so or that its competitors will not independently develop products that are substantially equivalent or superior to Nuvilex’s products.

Nuvilex also relies on trade secrets and proprietary know-how, which the Company seeks to protect by confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements with its employees, consultants, and third parties.  There can be no assurance that these agreements will not be breached, that the Company will have adequate remedies for any breach, or that certain of Nuvilex’s trade secrets and proprietary know-how will not otherwise become known or be discovered by competitors.

Litigation may become necessary to enforce Nuvilex’s intellectual property rights, to protect trade secrets, to determine the validity or scope of the proprietary rights of others, or to defend against claims of infringement or invalidity. Such litigation, whether successful or unsuccessful, could result in substantial costs and diversions of management resources, either of which could have a materially adverse effect on Nuvilex’s business, prospects, financial condition, or operating results.

Availability and Coverage of Insurance

For certain risks, the Company does not maintain insurance coverage because of cost and/or availability. Because the Company retains some portion of its insurable risks, and in some cases self-insures completely, unforeseen or catastrophic losses in excess of insured limits could have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and operating results.

Federal, State, Local and Foreign Laws and Regulations

The Company’s past research, product development and manufacturing activities have involved the controlled use of hazardous materials, and the Company may incur significant costs as a result of the need to comply with numerous laws and regulations. The Company is subject to laws and regulations enforced by the FDA, the DEA, the CDHS, foreign health authorities and other regulatory statutes including the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Environmental Protection Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and other current and potential federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations governing the use, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of the Company’s products, materials used to develop the Company’s products, and resulting waste products.

24

Penny Stock Regulation

The Company’s securities may be subject to “penny stock rules” that impose additional sales requirements on broker-dealers who sell such securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors (generally those with assets in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 together with their spouse). For transactions covered by these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchase of such securities and have received the purchaser’s written consent to the transaction prior to the purchase.  Additionally, for any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the “penny stock rules” require the delivery, prior to the transaction, of a disclosure schedule prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must disclose the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities. Finally, monthly statements must be sent disclosing recent price information on the limited market in penny stocks. Consequently, the “penny stock rules” may restrict the ability of broker-dealers to sell the Company’s securities. The foregoing required penny stock restrictions will not apply to the Company’s common stock if such securities maintain a market price of $5.00 or greater. The market price of the Company’s common stock may not reach or remain at such a level.

Nuvilex anticipates it will expend significant financial and management resources in its efforts to comply with the internal control attestation provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 for the first quarter ending July 31, 2011.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the rules and regulations promulgated there under, require Nuvilex to have management attest to the adequacy of its internal controls in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ending April 30, 2011. The Company’s internal controls did not meet such requirements on April 30, 2011 or July 31, 2011 and the Company is working to make changes to its internal controls in order for management to be able to make the required attestations by the end of the fiscal year ending April 30, 2012. Larger public companies currently required to comply with Section 404 have incurred significant monetary and other expenses from diversion of management time and attention, the acquisition of new computer software, the employment of additional personnel and training and third party internal controls consultants.  In light of Nuvilex’s current capital position, the Company anticipates that it will be time-consuming, costly and difficult for it to develop and implement the internal controls necessary for management to make the required attestations. It is Nuvilex intention in any case, to do what is necessary regarding financial reporting and internal controls, through software, personnel, and third party consultants to succeed in implementing the necessary financial reporting and internal controls during year ended 2012.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

The Company’s office is located at 12510 Prosperity Blvd., Suite #310, Silver Spring, MD 20904.

ITEM 3.  [REMOVED AND RESERVED]

ITEM 4. [REMOVED AND RESERVED]

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

Except as so indicated in Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2, the following exhibits are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

25

26

*Exhibits 32.1 are being furnished and shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall such exhibits be deemed to be incorporated by reference in any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.

27

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

NUVILEX, INC.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

28